スポンサーサイト 

上記の広告は1ヶ月以上更新のないブログに表示されています。
新しい記事を書く事で広告が消せます。
[ --/--/-- --:-- ] スポンサー広告 | トラックバック(-) | コメント(-)

重い・・・ 

今日はlivedoorのサーバ落ちてた???
最近重いです・・・また乗り換えようかな・・・

とりあえず今日は休刊致します。
ご了承くださいませ。。。

スポンサーサイト
[ 2005/08/30 03:14 ] 生活 | TB(0) | CM(129)
Maybe the private blog is the way to go, though I suspect you'd need some time to get revved up for that. The pod/video angle sounds great, but that raises a lot of other questions. And it loses the immediacy that you enjoyed so long, which is one of the most unfortunate losses in all this.,
[ 2011/12/15 18:53 ] [ 編集 ]
I understand. That is why I made the point about the state caucus to come up with acceptable Presidential candidates. My fear is we have too many conservatives that may split our vote and let a Romney, Christie get in.,
[ 2011/12/15 19:14 ] [ 編集 ]
In doing this blog and thinking about this stuff, have you ever had any ideas for what kinds of tools (software, that is) that people could use to do things like share creative ideas in groups, create customer community, etc. etc.?,
[ 2011/12/15 19:58 ] [ 編集 ]
The reality is that the establishment in the Senate HATE CCB, modest as it really is and see the new Boehner plan as an out, since they figure they will get Reid to make a compromise since it is only 22 Billion in cuts.,
[ 2011/12/15 20:21 ] [ 編集 ]
It'd be kinda like the group blog idea, but with more of a "Where in the World is Carmen Sandiego?" vibe. And who didn't love playing that? :),
[ 2011/12/15 21:03 ] [ 編集 ]
Use your passion and geek expertise to liberate the latent creativity that resides in readers, something that works better than the linear, sequential and fast fading stream of comments (yeah, this is recursive). Comments are writing, but lets have something not as we know it. Writing in this box just feel a little klunky, there must be a better way, make a better blog :),
[ 2011/12/15 21:47 ] [ 編集 ]
I understand. That is why I made the point about the state caucus to come up with acceptable Presidential candidates. My fear is we have too many conservatives that may split our vote and let a Romney, Christie get in.,
[ 2011/12/15 22:32 ] [ 編集 ]
In relation to the Technorati rank it's pulled down via an API (geez I think that's what it's called) as is Alexa rank & the script calculates the index - I just need to record the figures in a spreadsheet for upload.,
[ 2011/12/15 22:54 ] [ 編集 ]
I see two basic options for you: Reduce visibility and do something completely different, or stay visible and continue publishing your own stuff under your own name. All the options you cite can be assigned to one of these two categories. I dearly hope you go with the second option, even though I would totally understand if you decide otherwise.,
[ 2011/12/15 23:38 ] [ 編集 ]
In relation to the Technorati rank it's pulled down via an API (geez I think that's what it's called) as is Alexa rank & the script calculates the index - I just need to record the figures in a spreadsheet for upload.,
[ 2011/12/16 00:01 ] [ 編集 ]
One condition would be that the groupblog would adopt your style. Similar to how the headfirst books have the same style but different writers. If you join the 37signals blog where you put up highly visual articles, in a see of more textual posts, you will still stand out.,
[ 2011/12/16 00:23 ] [ 編集 ]
It'd be kinda like the group blog idea, but with more of a "Where in the World is Carmen Sandiego?" vibe. And who didn't love playing that? :),
[ 2011/12/16 00:44 ] [ 編集 ]
I also really enjoy the idea of a group blog mostly because I've always been a fan of group blogs a la 37signals. It's a different take on things that I tend to enjoy, getting to see different opinions, group dynamics, etc.,
[ 2011/12/16 01:06 ] [ 編集 ]
I see two basic options for you: Reduce visibility and do something completely different, or stay visible and continue publishing your own stuff under your own name. All the options you cite can be assigned to one of these two categories. I dearly hope you go with the second option, even though I would totally understand if you decide otherwise.,
[ 2011/12/16 01:28 ] [ 編集 ]
Kathy, the content you have graciously shared with us every once in a while is both inspiring and entertaining. And a blog is the perfect medium for this. A lot of the content is about your style and creative personality. Thus, I would rule out the community-based ideas. I would probably only read your stuff anyway.,
[ 2011/12/16 02:12 ] [ 編集 ]
One condition would be that the groupblog would adopt your style. Similar to how the headfirst books have the same style but different writers. If you join the 37signals blog where you put up highly visual articles, in a see of more textual posts, you will still stand out.,
[ 2011/12/16 02:56 ] [ 編集 ]
Use your passion and geek expertise to liberate the latent creativity that resides in readers, something that works better than the linear, sequential and fast fading stream of comments (yeah, this is recursive). Comments are writing, but lets have something not as we know it. Writing in this box just feel a little klunky, there must be a better way, make a better blog :),
[ 2011/12/16 03:18 ] [ 編集 ]
I think that you'd probably do well in a consulting role where you are helping companies who want to improve in the area of creating passionate users (products and websites). Your knowledge of the field is shown well by your blogging, and maybe getting out in front of people will give you more of a reason to stay passionate about this subject area (if not the blog itself).,
[ 2011/12/16 03:40 ] [ 編集 ]
I always wondered if the Manchurian Candidate McLame would make an appearance. I think he is a victim of Stockholm Syndrome, too.,
[ 2011/12/16 04:03 ] [ 編集 ]
Use your passion and geek expertise to liberate the latent creativity that resides in readers, something that works better than the linear, sequential and fast fading stream of comments (yeah, this is recursive). Comments are writing, but lets have something not as we know it. Writing in this box just feel a little klunky, there must be a better way, make a better blog :),
[ 2011/12/16 04:25 ] [ 編集 ]
I do think that by working in a team, it will make it easier for you. The passion moves away from you and to the team of writers, the hate will move with it. Being a part of a groupblog would be a good solution.,
[ 2011/12/16 04:47 ] [ 編集 ]
That aside, I think that a multiple-contributor blog would give you support and provide some other perspectives. You could combine this with your ideas on coaching/ghostwriting and work with 'intern' contributors to hone their skills, see their work supplying your site, and give them the tools they need to take your philosophies and understanding out on their own tangents. It might give you a regular supply of fresh, new writers and keep things going while allowing you to step back a little. (If you did go with the intern idea, drop me a line, will you? *g*),
[ 2011/12/16 05:09 ] [ 編集 ]
It'd be kinda like the group blog idea, but with more of a "Where in the World is Carmen Sandiego?" vibe. And who didn't love playing that? :),
[ 2011/12/16 05:31 ] [ 編集 ]
In relation to the Technorati rank it's pulled down via an API (geez I think that's what it's called) as is Alexa rank & the script calculates the index - I just need to record the figures in a spreadsheet for upload.,
[ 2011/12/16 05:52 ] [ 編集 ]
Oodles of bloggers great and small would give a #1 Technorati rank (or insert personal thing of inestimable value here) to be able to host Kathy Sierra as a guest blogger. (Myself included.),
[ 2011/12/16 06:14 ] [ 編集 ]
That's fine for the House and Senate but for president, there is no way any conservative should vote for either Democrat that will be stuffed down our throats next year. The House is the grand prize. If we had someone like Jim Jordan as Speaker and more than the current 3 reliable conservative senators, the president wouldn't matter.,
[ 2011/12/16 06:36 ] [ 編集 ]
Kathy, the content you have graciously shared with us every once in a while is both inspiring and entertaining. And a blog is the perfect medium for this. A lot of the content is about your style and creative personality. Thus, I would rule out the community-based ideas. I would probably only read your stuff anyway.,
[ 2011/12/16 06:58 ] [ 編集 ]
Just look at the difference just 20-30 rock solid Tea Party conservatives have made in the House already. They've turned "1/3 of the government" on its head and started a war between the establishment party and the Tea Party.,
[ 2011/12/16 07:42 ] [ 編集 ]
Having said all of that, I wonder if Ande's idea isn't the best (regardless of what format you choose to go with for the blog). If it was still public with no comments, but you cross-posted entries in a private forum, you could allow people to respond and discuss in a controlled/private environment, but still keep the blog itself public. I'm not sure how much extra work that would be for you, but if it was negligible I would say that's the best option for running your site the way you have and seem to love, but keeping the riffraff at bay.,
[ 2011/12/16 08:04 ] [ 編集 ]
Oodles of bloggers great and small would give a #1 Technorati rank (or insert personal thing of inestimable value here) to be able to host Kathy Sierra as a guest blogger. (Myself included.),
[ 2011/12/16 08:48 ] [ 編集 ]
What is really infuriating is his denial that he was attacking the Tea Party. He was "only reading a WSJ article" on the floor of the Senate. Hannity could have done a better job of hammering on THAT giant piece of brazen hypocrisy.,
[ 2011/12/16 09:09 ] [ 編集 ]
Just look at the difference just 20-30 rock solid Tea Party conservatives have made in the House already. They've turned "1/3 of the government" on its head and started a war between the establishment party and the Tea Party.,
[ 2011/12/16 09:31 ] [ 編集 ]
In doing this blog and thinking about this stuff, have you ever had any ideas for what kinds of tools (software, that is) that people could use to do things like share creative ideas in groups, create customer community, etc. etc.?,
[ 2011/12/16 09:52 ] [ 編集 ]
I do think that by working in a team, it will make it easier for you. The passion moves away from you and to the team of writers, the hate will move with it. Being a part of a groupblog would be a good solution.,
[ 2011/12/16 10:13 ] [ 編集 ]
I think that you'd probably do well in a consulting role where you are helping companies who want to improve in the area of creating passionate users (products and websites). Your knowledge of the field is shown well by your blogging, and maybe getting out in front of people will give you more of a reason to stay passionate about this subject area (if not the blog itself).,
[ 2011/12/16 10:35 ] [ 編集 ]
Use your passion and geek expertise to liberate the latent creativity that resides in readers, something that works better than the linear, sequential and fast fading stream of comments (yeah, this is recursive). Comments are writing, but lets have something not as we know it. Writing in this box just feel a little klunky, there must be a better way, make a better blog :),
[ 2011/12/16 10:57 ] [ 編集 ]
The reality is that the establishment in the Senate HATE CCB, modest as it really is and see the new Boehner plan as an out, since they figure they will get Reid to make a compromise since it is only 22 Billion in cuts.,
[ 2011/12/16 11:18 ] [ 編集 ]
It's entirely possible that I copied that individual number across incorrectly (and that the index was correct), but when I did the query just then it returned a Technorati Rank of 37, so as you say there would be no change in the rank, but an improvement in your index.,
[ 2011/12/16 11:40 ] [ 編集 ]
O.K. I give up. What is your beef with Gutfeld? I think he is hilarious! He is not a serious contributor, but is there for laughs. I like him.,
[ 2011/12/16 12:02 ] [ 編集 ]
One condition would be that the groupblog would adopt your style. Similar to how the headfirst books have the same style but different writers. If you join the 37signals blog where you put up highly visual articles, in a see of more textual posts, you will still stand out.,
[ 2011/12/16 12:24 ] [ 編集 ]
Maybe the private blog is the way to go, though I suspect you'd need some time to get revved up for that. The pod/video angle sounds great, but that raises a lot of other questions. And it loses the immediacy that you enjoyed so long, which is one of the most unfortunate losses in all this.,
[ 2011/12/16 13:07 ] [ 編集 ]
I think greater interaction among groups would result (mix up the tech bloggers and the marketers and the VCs and the usability people and, hell, even the sex bloggers) ;) and really spark some awesome conversations.,
[ 2011/12/16 13:29 ] [ 編集 ]
I think greater interaction among groups would result (mix up the tech bloggers and the marketers and the VCs and the usability people and, hell, even the sex bloggers) ;) and really spark some awesome conversations.,
[ 2011/12/16 13:50 ] [ 編集 ]
I always wondered if the Manchurian Candidate McLame would make an appearance. I think he is a victim of Stockholm Syndrome, too.,
[ 2011/12/16 14:34 ] [ 編集 ]
That's fine for the House and Senate but for president, there is no way any conservative should vote for either Democrat that will be stuffed down our throats next year. The House is the grand prize. If we had someone like Jim Jordan as Speaker and more than the current 3 reliable conservative senators, the president wouldn't matter.,
[ 2011/12/16 14:56 ] [ 編集 ]
I think that you'd probably do well in a consulting role where you are helping companies who want to improve in the area of creating passionate users (products and websites). Your knowledge of the field is shown well by your blogging, and maybe getting out in front of people will give you more of a reason to stay passionate about this subject area (if not the blog itself).,
[ 2011/12/16 15:17 ] [ 編集 ]
I always wondered if the Manchurian Candidate McLame would make an appearance. I think he is a victim of Stockholm Syndrome, too.,
[ 2011/12/16 16:01 ] [ 編集 ]
I always wondered if the Manchurian Candidate McLame would make an appearance. I think he is a victim of Stockholm Syndrome, too.,
[ 2011/12/16 16:23 ] [ 編集 ]
That's fine for the House and Senate but for president, there is no way any conservative should vote for either Democrat that will be stuffed down our throats next year. The House is the grand prize. If we had someone like Jim Jordan as Speaker and more than the current 3 reliable conservative senators, the president wouldn't matter.,
[ 2011/12/16 16:44 ] [ 編集 ]
I see two basic options for you: Reduce visibility and do something completely different, or stay visible and continue publishing your own stuff under your own name. All the options you cite can be assigned to one of these two categories. I dearly hope you go with the second option, even though I would totally understand if you decide otherwise.,
[ 2011/12/16 17:07 ] [ 編集 ]
I'm not sure what you have against "The Five". I mean, four of the five panel members are on the right. The only creep is Bob Beckel. I admit, his creepiness makes the show a bit harder to handle. But Greg Gutfeld makes up for it! I LOVE him!! Beckel will probably have a stroke or a heart attack on the show one day and they can just shove him off the stage and continue on.,
[ 2011/12/16 17:28 ] [ 編集 ]
Just look at the difference just 20-30 rock solid Tea Party conservatives have made in the House already. They've turned "1/3 of the government" on its head and started a war between the establishment party and the Tea Party.,
[ 2011/12/16 17:50 ] [ 編集 ]
It'd be kinda like the group blog idea, but with more of a "Where in the World is Carmen Sandiego?" vibe. And who didn't love playing that? :),
[ 2011/12/16 18:12 ] [ 編集 ]
I see two basic options for you: Reduce visibility and do something completely different, or stay visible and continue publishing your own stuff under your own name. All the options you cite can be assigned to one of these two categories. I dearly hope you go with the second option, even though I would totally understand if you decide otherwise.,
[ 2011/12/16 18:33 ] [ 編集 ]
Oodles of bloggers great and small would give a #1 Technorati rank (or insert personal thing of inestimable value here) to be able to host Kathy Sierra as a guest blogger. (Myself included.),
[ 2011/12/16 19:17 ] [ 編集 ]
I think greater interaction among groups would result (mix up the tech bloggers and the marketers and the VCs and the usability people and, hell, even the sex bloggers) ;) and really spark some awesome conversations.,
[ 2011/12/16 19:39 ] [ 編集 ]
I was thinking the same thing about Alexa as there was quite a lot of movement. They might have readjusted their adjustment for "technology skew" - or what ever it was...,
[ 2011/12/16 20:01 ] [ 編集 ]
Honestly said, I don't think you can do anything to fend off the attacks. I don't think you got attacked because of something you did, but because lots of people admire you and your work. That's apparently enough for some people to hate you. Only by unpassionating your readers, can you hope to actually stop the haters. I hope you will reject that option.,
[ 2011/12/16 21:50 ] [ 編集 ]
It would also make it a lot harder for bullying to take place, since anyone stupid enough to try it would be taking on a potentially even bigger community, as well as whoever happened to be hosting you. (Anyone who did host would have your back 100% and be able to manage comment moderation and such so you'd never even have to see the garbage.),
[ 2011/12/16 22:12 ] [ 編集 ]
What is really infuriating is his denial that he was attacking the Tea Party. He was "only reading a WSJ article" on the floor of the Senate. Hannity could have done a better job of hammering on THAT giant piece of brazen hypocrisy.,
[ 2011/12/16 22:34 ] [ 編集 ]
Having said all of that, I wonder if Ande's idea isn't the best (regardless of what format you choose to go with for the blog). If it was still public with no comments, but you cross-posted entries in a private forum, you could allow people to respond and discuss in a controlled/private environment, but still keep the blog itself public. I'm not sure how much extra work that would be for you, but if it was negligible I would say that's the best option for running your site the way you have and seem to love, but keeping the riffraff at bay.,
[ 2011/12/16 23:41 ] [ 編集 ]
I do hesitate to run with the other commenters that say you should monetize this, but you should make it at least a part-time passion where you are getting to stretch out on the things you write about, and then allow experiences to craft other posts.,
[ 2011/12/17 00:03 ] [ 編集 ]
I understand. That is why I made the point about the state caucus to come up with acceptable Presidential candidates. My fear is we have too many conservatives that may split our vote and let a Romney, Christie get in.,
[ 2011/12/17 00:46 ] [ 編集 ]
Take me for example. I could support Bachman, Cain, Palin, or Santorum. in no particular order. Others would choose fewer plus Paul.,
[ 2011/12/17 01:09 ] [ 編集 ]
It'd be kinda like the group blog idea, but with more of a "Where in the World is Carmen Sandiego?" vibe. And who didn't love playing that? :),
[ 2011/12/17 01:53 ] [ 編集 ]
It would also make it a lot harder for bullying to take place, since anyone stupid enough to try it would be taking on a potentially even bigger community, as well as whoever happened to be hosting you. (Anyone who did host would have your back 100% and be able to manage comment moderation and such so you'd never even have to see the garbage.),
[ 2011/12/17 02:16 ] [ 編集 ]
[ 2011/12/19 09:07 ] [ 編集 ]
Honestly said, I don't think you can do anything to fend off the attacks. I don't think you got attacked because of something you did, but because lots of people admire you and your work. That's apparently enough for some people to hate you. Only by unpassionating your readers, can you hope to actually stop the haters. I hope you will reject that option., http://christinaaguileraboobs1.typepad.com christina aguilera boobs, 8-[[[, http://jessicabielsex2.typepad.com jessica biel sex, 456894, http://xnudexnakedlsex.insanejournal.com vida guerra sex, 476, http://deniserichardsnaked2.typepad.com denise richards naked, 4852, http://bodyqix.livejournal.com EMMA WATSON HOT, 8968,
[ 2011/12/23 20:11 ] [ 編集 ]
Is there a way use some sort of third party forum moderation to cut through this problem? Then you could go on in whatever way you are comfortable, your forums could coninue to buzz and anyone that's up to no good would hit a brick wall (or get a call from their local authorities, as appropriate). It's just a thought.,
[ 2011/12/28 02:35 ] [ 編集 ]
I do think that by working in a team, it will make it easier for you. The passion moves away from you and to the team of writers, the hate will move with it. Being a part of a groupblog would be a good solution.,
[ 2011/12/28 02:59 ] [ 編集 ]
That aside, I think that a multiple-contributor blog would give you support and provide some other perspectives. You could combine this with your ideas on coaching/ghostwriting and work with 'intern' contributors to hone their skills, see their work supplying your site, and give them the tools they need to take your philosophies and understanding out on their own tangents. It might give you a regular supply of fresh, new writers and keep things going while allowing you to step back a little. (If you did go with the intern idea, drop me a line, will you? *g*),
[ 2011/12/28 03:21 ] [ 編集 ]
Good for Hannity, hammering Mc Cain. Mc Cain off as so slimey. He completely bought into the Obama narrative and talks about the great calamity to come if there is no agreement, and continues to blast the Tea Party.,
[ 2011/12/28 05:16 ] [ 編集 ]
That's fine for the House and Senate but for president, there is no way any conservative should vote for either Democrat that will be stuffed down our throats next year. The House is the grand prize. If we had someone like Jim Jordan as Speaker and more than the current 3 reliable conservative senators, the president wouldn't matter.,
[ 2011/12/28 05:38 ] [ 編集 ]
It would also make it a lot harder for bullying to take place, since anyone stupid enough to try it would be taking on a potentially even bigger community, as well as whoever happened to be hosting you. (Anyone who did host would have your back 100% and be able to manage comment moderation and such so you'd never even have to see the garbage.),
[ 2011/12/28 06:46 ] [ 編集 ]
O.K. I give up. What is your beef with Gutfeld? I think he is hilarious! He is not a serious contributor, but is there for laughs. I like him., http://adriannecurryplayboyjq.tumblr.com adrianne curry playboy, %-PPP, http://katiepricesextapect.tumblr.com katie price sex tape, qav, http://brookeburkeplayboykz.tumblr.com brooke burke playboy, axppp, http://tarareidbreasthl.tumblr.com tara reid breast, vfrxyz, http://jessicasimpsonboobsgz.tumblr.com jessica simpson boobs, ftldq,
[ 2011/12/28 07:02 ] [ 編集 ]
I think that you'd probably do well in a consulting role where you are helping companies who want to improve in the area of creating passionate users (products and websites). Your knowledge of the field is shown well by your blogging, and maybe getting out in front of people will give you more of a reason to stay passionate about this subject area (if not the blog itself).,
[ 2011/12/28 07:09 ] [ 編集 ]
I do hesitate to run with the other commenters that say you should monetize this, but you should make it at least a part-time passion where you are getting to stretch out on the things you write about, and then allow experiences to craft other posts.,
[ 2011/12/28 07:54 ] [ 編集 ]
I always wondered if the Manchurian Candidate McLame would make an appearance. I think he is a victim of Stockholm Syndrome, too.,
[ 2011/12/28 08:16 ] [ 編集 ]
ould also do your (wonderful) thing around the blogosphere for a while (just not always here). Keep the juices flowing, continue to help people, foster even greater community growth, and not be an (ugh) static single target.,
[ 2011/12/28 08:39 ] [ 編集 ]
That's fine for the House and Senate but for president, there is no way any conservative should vote for either Democrat that will be stuffed down our throats next year. The House is the grand prize. If we had someone like Jim Jordan as Speaker and more than the current 3 reliable conservative senators, the president wouldn't matter.,
[ 2011/12/28 09:23 ] [ 編集 ]
I think greater interaction among groups would result (mix up the tech bloggers and the marketers and the VCs and the usability people and, hell, even the sex bloggers) ;) and really spark some awesome conversations.,
[ 2011/12/28 09:46 ] [ 編集 ]
I always wondered if the Manchurian Candidate McLame would make an appearance. I think he is a victim of Stockholm Syndrome, too.,
[ 2011/12/28 10:30 ] [ 編集 ]
I'm not sure what you have against "The Five". I mean, four of the five panel members are on the right. The only creep is Bob Beckel. I admit, his creepiness makes the show a bit harder to handle. But Greg Gutfeld makes up for it! I LOVE him!! Beckel will probably have a stroke or a heart attack on the show one day and they can just shove him off the stage and continue on.,
[ 2011/12/28 10:53 ] [ 編集 ]
And a belated Happy Easter to you too! The fruit cakes being compared to bricks definitely makes my chuckle list...perhaps some fruity garnish around the display would have added more relevance. It is quite strange how the human mind works, and association is key to avoid possible misyunderstandings like this one! Classic!,
[ 2011/12/28 11:17 ] [ 編集 ]
I was thinking the same thing about Alexa as there was quite a lot of movement. They might have readjusted their adjustment for "technology skew" - or what ever it was...,
[ 2011/12/28 12:26 ] [ 編集 ]
ould also do your (wonderful) thing around the blogosphere for a while (just not always here). Keep the juices flowing, continue to help people, foster even greater community growth, and not be an (ugh) static single target.,
[ 2011/12/28 13:38 ] [ 編集 ]
I think greater interaction among groups would result (mix up the tech bloggers and the marketers and the VCs and the usability people and, hell, even the sex bloggers) ;) and really spark some awesome conversations.,
[ 2011/12/28 14:02 ] [ 編集 ]
I'm not sure what you have against "The Five". I mean, four of the five panel members are on the right. The only creep is Bob Beckel. I admit, his creepiness makes the show a bit harder to handle. But Greg Gutfeld makes up for it! I LOVE him!! Beckel will probably have a stroke or a heart attack on the show one day and they can just shove him off the stage and continue on.,
[ 2011/12/28 14:26 ] [ 編集 ]
I do hesitate to run with the other commenters that say you should monetize this, but you should make it at least a part-time passion where you are getting to stretch out on the things you write about, and then allow experiences to craft other posts.,
[ 2011/12/28 15:14 ] [ 編集 ]
I hate to see us lose your input but I wonder if simply publishing articles with no comments enabled and having a members-only forum wouldn't be a good compromise. There's something about the immediacy of the response form and the lack of accountability available from anonymity (oh, hypocritical me) that seems to encourage people's awfulness.,
[ 2011/12/28 17:15 ] [ 編集 ]
Only reason I voted for him was SARAH. I wasn't even going to vote until he picked her. I had voted in every election since the late 1960?s.,
[ 2011/12/28 18:02 ] [ 編集 ]
Has he joined Obama in Wonderland where up is down and left is right? What's "fiscally conservative" about voting for every spending measure in sight?,
[ 2011/12/28 18:24 ] [ 編集 ]
Use your passion and geek expertise to liberate the latent creativity that resides in readers, something that works better than the linear, sequential and fast fading stream of comments (yeah, this is recursive). Comments are writing, but lets have something not as we know it. Writing in this box just feel a little klunky, there must be a better way, make a better blog :),
[ 2011/12/28 18:47 ] [ 編集 ]
The reality is that the establishment in the Senate HATE CCB, modest as it really is and see the new Boehner plan as an out, since they figure they will get Reid to make a compromise since it is only 22 Billion in cuts.,
[ 2011/12/28 19:10 ] [ 編集 ]
I think greater interaction among groups would result (mix up the tech bloggers and the marketers and the VCs and the usability people and, hell, even the sex bloggers) ;) and really spark some awesome conversations.,
[ 2011/12/28 19:55 ] [ 編集 ]
I do think that by working in a team, it will make it easier for you. The passion moves away from you and to the team of writers, the hate will move with it. Being a part of a groupblog would be a good solution.,
[ 2011/12/28 21:25 ] [ 編集 ]
I see two basic options for you: Reduce visibility and do something completely different, or stay visible and continue publishing your own stuff under your own name. All the options you cite can be assigned to one of these two categories. I dearly hope you go with the second option, even though I would totally understand if you decide otherwise.,
[ 2011/12/28 23:17 ] [ 編集 ]
It's entirely possible that I copied that individual number across incorrectly (and that the index was correct), but when I did the query just then it returned a Technorati Rank of 37, so as you say there would be no change in the rank, but an improvement in your index.,
[ 2011/12/29 00:03 ] [ 編集 ]
Good for Hannity, hammering Mc Cain. Mc Cain off as so slimey. He completely bought into the Obama narrative and talks about the great calamity to come if there is no agreement, and continues to blast the Tea Party.,
[ 2011/12/29 00:26 ] [ 編集 ]
Just look at the difference just 20-30 rock solid Tea Party conservatives have made in the House already. They've turned "1/3 of the government" on its head and started a war between the establishment party and the Tea Party.,
[ 2011/12/29 01:35 ] [ 編集 ]
[ 2012/01/05 17:26 ] [ 編集 ]
Take me for example. I could support Bachman, Cain, Palin, or Santorum. in no particular order. Others would choose fewer plus Paul.,
[ 2012/01/14 00:51 ] [ 編集 ]
I was thinking the same thing about Alexa as there was quite a lot of movement. They might have readjusted their adjustment for "technology skew" - or what ever it was...,
[ 2012/01/14 01:52 ] [ 編集 ]
In relation to the Technorati rank it's pulled down via an API (geez I think that's what it's called) as is Alexa rank & the script calculates the index - I just need to record the figures in a spreadsheet for upload.,
[ 2012/01/14 02:21 ] [ 編集 ]
Good for Hannity, hammering Mc Cain. Mc Cain off as so slimey. He completely bought into the Obama narrative and talks about the great calamity to come if there is no agreement, and continues to blast the Tea Party.,
[ 2012/01/14 03:20 ] [ 編集 ]
ould also do your (wonderful) thing around the blogosphere for a while (just not always here). Keep the juices flowing, continue to help people, foster even greater community growth, and not be an (ugh) static single target.,
[ 2012/01/14 05:50 ] [ 編集 ]
The reality is that the establishment in the Senate HATE CCB, modest as it really is and see the new Boehner plan as an out, since they figure they will get Reid to make a compromise since it is only 22 Billion in cuts.,
[ 2012/01/14 06:16 ] [ 編集 ]
I was thinking the same thing about Alexa as there was quite a lot of movement. They might have readjusted their adjustment for "technology skew" - or what ever it was...,
[ 2012/01/14 07:13 ] [ 編集 ]
Is there a way use some sort of third party forum moderation to cut through this problem? Then you could go on in whatever way you are comfortable, your forums could coninue to buzz and anyone that's up to no good would hit a brick wall (or get a call from their local authorities, as appropriate). It's just a thought.,
[ 2012/01/14 08:10 ] [ 編集 ]
That aside, I think that a multiple-contributor blog would give you support and provide some other perspectives. You could combine this with your ideas on coaching/ghostwriting and work with 'intern' contributors to hone their skills, see their work supplying your site, and give them the tools they need to take your philosophies and understanding out on their own tangents. It might give you a regular supply of fresh, new writers and keep things going while allowing you to step back a little. (If you did go with the intern idea, drop me a line, will you? *g*),
[ 2012/01/14 08:40 ] [ 編集 ]
That's fine for the House and Senate but for president, there is no way any conservative should vote for either Democrat that will be stuffed down our throats next year. The House is the grand prize. If we had someone like Jim Jordan as Speaker and more than the current 3 reliable conservative senators, the president wouldn't matter.,
[ 2012/01/14 10:10 ] [ 編集 ]
I was thinking the same thing about Alexa as there was quite a lot of movement. They might have readjusted their adjustment for "technology skew" - or what ever it was...,
[ 2012/01/14 10:38 ] [ 編集 ]
I think greater interaction among groups would result (mix up the tech bloggers and the marketers and the VCs and the usability people and, hell, even the sex bloggers) ;) and really spark some awesome conversations.,
[ 2012/01/14 12:07 ] [ 編集 ]
I always wondered if the Manchurian Candidate McLame would make an appearance. I think he is a victim of Stockholm Syndrome, too.,
[ 2012/01/14 13:06 ] [ 編集 ]
That's fine for the House and Senate but for president, there is no way any conservative should vote for either Democrat that will be stuffed down our throats next year. The House is the grand prize. If we had someone like Jim Jordan as Speaker and more than the current 3 reliable conservative senators, the president wouldn't matter.,
[ 2012/01/14 14:35 ] [ 編集 ]
In doing this blog and thinking about this stuff, have you ever had any ideas for what kinds of tools (software, that is) that people could use to do things like share creative ideas in groups, create customer community, etc. etc.?,
[ 2012/01/14 15:04 ] [ 編集 ]
I do hesitate to run with the other commenters that say you should monetize this, but you should make it at least a part-time passion where you are getting to stretch out on the things you write about, and then allow experiences to craft other posts.,
[ 2012/01/14 15:33 ] [ 編集 ]
I also really enjoy the idea of a group blog mostly because I've always been a fan of group blogs a la 37signals. It's a different take on things that I tend to enjoy, getting to see different opinions, group dynamics, etc., http://annehathawaybikinilw.tumblr.com anne hathaway bikini, >:-PPP, http://natalieportmansexytb.tumblr.com natalie portman sexy, >:], http://minkakellynudevq.tumblr.com minka kelly nude, >:[[[, http://evamendespornos.tumblr.com eva mendes porn, 850, http://katrinakaifsexdb.tumblr.com katrina kaif sex, 557692,
[ 2012/01/18 09:44 ] [ 編集 ]
[ 2012/01/23 12:40 ] [ 編集 ]
I'm not sure what you have against "The Five". I mean, four of the five panel members are on the right. The only creep is Bob Beckel. I admit, his creepiness makes the show a bit harder to handle. But Greg Gutfeld makes up for it! I LOVE him!! Beckel will probably have a stroke or a heart attack on the show one day and they can just shove him off the stage and continue on., http://denisemilanitoplessch.tumblr.com denise milani topless, >:-DDD, http://chynaplayboyhl.tumblr.com chyna playboy, dlsir, http://kristindavissextapeaf.tumblr.com kristin davis sex tape, 45015, http://mirandacosgrovehotqj.tumblr.com miranda cosgrove hot, 405602, http://lindsaylohanpussyos.tumblr.com lindsay lohan pussy, 69824,
[ 2012/01/25 07:27 ] [ 編集 ]
I like the idea of a private blog if getting the RSS and reading posts was as simple as public. If there are too many hoops just to get notice of and read a single post it will get frustrating., http://selenagomeznude3.typepad.com selena gomez nude, 8-(((, http://roselynsancheznude3.typepad.com roselyn sanchez nude, 141, http://selenagomezporn3.typepad.com selena gomez porn, qrfkf, http://lindsaylohannaked2.typepad.com lindsay lohan naked, lgum, http://sandrabullocknude2.typepad.com sandra bullock nude, znwynw,
[ 2012/01/25 20:38 ] [ 編集 ]
I do think that by working in a team, it will make it easier for you. The passion moves away from you and to the team of writers, the hate will move with it. Being a part of a groupblog would be a good solution., http://vanessahudgensnaked3.typepad.com vanessa hudgens naked, :-[, http://mariskahargitaynude2.typepad.com mariska hargitay nude, 572, http://kimkardashiansexvideo2.typepad.com kim kardashian sex video, vrgjyy, http://christinahendricksnaked3.typepad.com christina hendricks naked, xjm, http://selenagomeztits1.typepad.com selena gomez tits, >:OOO,
[ 2012/01/27 10:24 ] [ 編集 ]
That's fine for the House and Senate but for president, there is no way any conservative should vote for either Democrat that will be stuffed down our throats next year. The House is the grand prize. If we had someone like Jim Jordan as Speaker and more than the current 3 reliable conservative senators, the president wouldn't matter., http://zooeydeschanelnaked3.typepad.com zooey deschanel naked, =-D, http://meganfoxnude3.typepad.com megan fox nude, :((, http://cassidyfreemannude1.typepad.com cassidy freeman nude, ebfos, http://angelinajolienaked3.typepad.com angelina jolie naked, 8D, http://meganfoxsexvideo2.typepad.com megan fox sex video, 473,
[ 2012/01/28 01:24 ] [ 編集 ]
Is there a way use some sort of third party forum moderation to cut through this problem? Then you could go on in whatever way you are comfortable, your forums could coninue to buzz and anyone that's up to no good would hit a brick wall (or get a call from their local authorities, as appropriate). It's just a thought., http://pamelaandersonsextape2.typepad.com pamela anderson sex tape, :-DDD, http://elishacuthbertnude3.typepad.com elisha cuthbert nude, wdptu, http://aishwaryarainude2.typepad.com aishwarya rai nude, weo, http://vanessahudgensnude4.typepad.com vanessa hudgens nude, ifjhcz, http://mirandacosgroveporn2.typepad.com miranda cosgrove porn, =-DD,
[ 2012/01/28 16:28 ] [ 編集 ]
I'm not sure what you have against "The Five". I mean, four of the five panel members are on the right. The only creep is Bob Beckel. I admit, his creepiness makes the show a bit harder to handle. But Greg Gutfeld makes up for it! I LOVE him!! Beckel will probably have a stroke or a heart attack on the show one day and they can just shove him off the stage and continue on., http://emilybluntnude3.typepad.com emily blunt nude, 931465, http://haydenpanettierenaked2.typepad.com hayden panettiere naked, 1976, http://elizabethbanksnude3.typepad.com elizabeth banks nude, wbwoz, http://juliebowennaked2.typepad.com julie bowen naked, =-[, http://reneezellwegernude1.typepad.com renee zellweger nude, 23480,
[ 2012/01/29 09:02 ] [ 編集 ]
Use your passion and geek expertise to liberate the latent creativity that resides in readers, something that works better than the linear, sequential and fast fading stream of comments (yeah, this is recursive). Comments are writing, but lets have something not as we know it. Writing in this box just feel a little klunky, there must be a better way, make a better blog :), http://helenmirrennude3.typepad.com helen mirren nude, :-[[[, http://saraunderwoodnaked2.typepad.com sara underwood naked, 77722, http://aishwaryaraiporn2.typepad.com aishwarya rai porn, :-O, http://kathleenrobertsonnude2.typepad.com kathleen robertson nude, >:OOO, http://annehathawaynude4.typepad.com anne hathaway nude, :PPP,
[ 2012/01/29 17:30 ] [ 編集 ]
Maybe the private blog is the way to go, though I suspect you'd need some time to get revved up for that. The pod/video angle sounds great, but that raises a lot of other questions. And it loses the immediacy that you enjoyed so long, which is one of the most unfortunate losses in all this., http://monicabelluccinude3.typepad.com monica bellucci nude, lzvfci, http://sandrabullocknaked3.typepad.com sandra bullock naked, 249428, http://mariaozawasex3.typepad.com maria ozawa sex, ydm, http://jessicasimpsonsextape3.typepad.com jessica simpson sex tape, 19849, http://goldiehawnnude2.typepad.com goldie hawn nude, bejjk,
[ 2012/01/29 18:00 ] [ 編集 ]
It would also make it a lot harder for bullying to take place, since anyone stupid enough to try it would be taking on a potentially even bigger community, as well as whoever happened to be hosting you. (Anyone who did host would have your back 100% and be able to manage comment moderation and such so you'd never even have to see the garbage.), http://jennifergarnernude3.typepad.com jennifer garner nude, afjsoc, http://jennettemccurdynude3.typepad.com jennette mccurdy nude, 952359, http://kimkardashiannaked3.typepad.com kim kardashian naked, :-OOO, http://jenniferlopezporn2.typepad.com jennifer lopez porn, 7022, http://shakirasextape4.typepad.com shakira sex tape, xwg,
[ 2012/01/30 03:57 ] [ 編集 ]
It's entirely possible that I copied that individual number across incorrectly (and that the index was correct), but when I did the query just then it returned a Technorati Rank of 37, so as you say there would be no change in the rank, but an improvement in your index., http://camerondiaznude2.typepad.com cameron diaz nude, naxzd, http://amberheardnude5.typepad.com amber heard nude, uft, http://emmawatsonporn2.typepad.com emma watson porn, 150442, http://annanicolesmithnude2.typepad.com anna nicole smith nude, 8PP, http://kirstendunstnude2.typepad.com kirsten dunst nude, 2782,
[ 2012/01/30 09:53 ] [ 編集 ]
コメントの投稿













管理者にだけ表示を許可する
カレンダー
04 | 2017/05 | 06
- 1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31 - - -
プロフィール

43

Author:43
43のBlogへようこそ!

見たログ
Skype!

My status

QRコード
QRコード

上記広告は1ヶ月以上更新のないブログに表示されています。新しい記事を書くことで広告を消せます。