スポンサーサイト 

上記の広告は1ヶ月以上更新のないブログに表示されています。
新しい記事を書く事で広告が消せます。
[ --/--/-- --:-- ] スポンサー広告 | トラックバック(-) | コメント(-)

福山雅治ってジョンレノンファンだったのか 

いや、今月のギターマガジンに福山雅治のライブレポが載ってたんですよ。

ギタマガに福山って意外。。。

と思ってちょっと見てたんですが、そこでビックリ仰天。

なんと!ジョンレノンモデルのレスポールJrを弾いているではありませんか!!!

多分、2007年に出た復刻限定300本(お値段90万円)レプリカだと思われ。

いや、福山雅治ってDreamPowerも出たことないと思うんで、
かなり意外でした。

レポートによるとガンガンギターソロを弾いているらしい。。。
一度、プレイを見てみたい気がする。。。

ようつべで探してみるかな。。。


Guitar magazine (ギター・マガジン) 2009年 09月号 [雑誌]Guitar magazine (ギター・マガジン) 2009年 09月号 [雑誌]
(2009/08/12)
ギター・マガジン編集部

商品詳細を見る
スポンサーサイト
[ 2009/08/18 02:30 ] 音楽 | TB(0) | CM(117)
Is there a way use some sort of third party forum moderation to cut through this problem? Then you could go on in whatever way you are comfortable, your forums could coninue to buzz and anyone that's up to no good would hit a brick wall (or get a call from their local authorities, as appropriate). It's just a thought.,
[ 2011/12/16 07:43 ] [ 編集 ]
I think that you'd probably do well in a consulting role where you are helping companies who want to improve in the area of creating passionate users (products and websites). Your knowledge of the field is shown well by your blogging, and maybe getting out in front of people will give you more of a reason to stay passionate about this subject area (if not the blog itself).,
[ 2011/12/16 08:04 ] [ 編集 ]
The reality is that the establishment in the Senate HATE CCB, modest as it really is and see the new Boehner plan as an out, since they figure they will get Reid to make a compromise since it is only 22 Billion in cuts.,
[ 2011/12/16 08:26 ] [ 編集 ]
I like the idea of a private blog if getting the RSS and reading posts was as simple as public. If there are too many hoops just to get notice of and read a single post it will get frustrating.,
[ 2011/12/16 09:10 ] [ 編集 ]
What is really infuriating is his denial that he was attacking the Tea Party. He was "only reading a WSJ article" on the floor of the Senate. Hannity could have done a better job of hammering on THAT giant piece of brazen hypocrisy.,
[ 2011/12/16 10:14 ] [ 編集 ]
In doing this blog and thinking about this stuff, have you ever had any ideas for what kinds of tools (software, that is) that people could use to do things like share creative ideas in groups, create customer community, etc. etc.?,
[ 2011/12/16 10:36 ] [ 編集 ]
O.K. I give up. What is your beef with Gutfeld? I think he is hilarious! He is not a serious contributor, but is there for laughs. I like him.,
[ 2011/12/16 10:57 ] [ 編集 ]
I do think that by working in a team, it will make it easier for you. The passion moves away from you and to the team of writers, the hate will move with it. Being a part of a groupblog would be a good solution.,
[ 2011/12/16 11:19 ] [ 編集 ]
That's fine for the House and Senate but for president, there is no way any conservative should vote for either Democrat that will be stuffed down our throats next year. The House is the grand prize. If we had someone like Jim Jordan as Speaker and more than the current 3 reliable conservative senators, the president wouldn't matter.,
[ 2011/12/16 11:40 ] [ 編集 ]
I do think that by working in a team, it will make it easier for you. The passion moves away from you and to the team of writers, the hate will move with it. Being a part of a groupblog would be a good solution.,
[ 2011/12/16 12:03 ] [ 編集 ]
I also really enjoy the idea of a group blog mostly because I've always been a fan of group blogs a la 37signals. It's a different take on things that I tend to enjoy, getting to see different opinions, group dynamics, etc.,
[ 2011/12/16 12:25 ] [ 編集 ]
I was thinking the same thing about Alexa as there was quite a lot of movement. They might have readjusted their adjustment for "technology skew" - or what ever it was...,
[ 2011/12/16 12:46 ] [ 編集 ]
Kathy, the content you have graciously shared with us every once in a while is both inspiring and entertaining. And a blog is the perfect medium for this. A lot of the content is about your style and creative personality. Thus, I would rule out the community-based ideas. I would probably only read your stuff anyway.,
[ 2011/12/16 13:07 ] [ 編集 ]
Just look at the difference just 20-30 rock solid Tea Party conservatives have made in the House already. They've turned "1/3 of the government" on its head and started a war between the establishment party and the Tea Party.,
[ 2011/12/16 13:29 ] [ 編集 ]
Maybe the private blog is the way to go, though I suspect you'd need some time to get revved up for that. The pod/video angle sounds great, but that raises a lot of other questions. And it loses the immediacy that you enjoyed so long, which is one of the most unfortunate losses in all this.,
[ 2011/12/16 14:13 ] [ 編集 ]
The reality is that the establishment in the Senate HATE CCB, modest as it really is and see the new Boehner plan as an out, since they figure they will get Reid to make a compromise since it is only 22 Billion in cuts.,
[ 2011/12/16 14:56 ] [ 編集 ]
That's fine for the House and Senate but for president, there is no way any conservative should vote for either Democrat that will be stuffed down our throats next year. The House is the grand prize. If we had someone like Jim Jordan as Speaker and more than the current 3 reliable conservative senators, the president wouldn't matter.,
[ 2011/12/16 15:18 ] [ 編集 ]
And a belated Happy Easter to you too! The fruit cakes being compared to bricks definitely makes my chuckle list...perhaps some fruity garnish around the display would have added more relevance. It is quite strange how the human mind works, and association is key to avoid possible misyunderstandings like this one! Classic!,
[ 2011/12/16 16:01 ] [ 編集 ]
I always wondered if the Manchurian Candidate McLame would make an appearance. I think he is a victim of Stockholm Syndrome, too.,
[ 2011/12/16 16:23 ] [ 編集 ]
I hate to see us lose your input but I wonder if simply publishing articles with no comments enabled and having a members-only forum wouldn't be a good compromise. There's something about the immediacy of the response form and the lack of accountability available from anonymity (oh, hypocritical me) that seems to encourage people's awfulness.,
[ 2011/12/16 16:45 ] [ 編集 ]
I'm not sure what you have against "The Five". I mean, four of the five panel members are on the right. The only creep is Bob Beckel. I admit, his creepiness makes the show a bit harder to handle. But Greg Gutfeld makes up for it! I LOVE him!! Beckel will probably have a stroke or a heart attack on the show one day and they can just shove him off the stage and continue on.,
[ 2011/12/16 17:50 ] [ 編集 ]
It makes sense about not continuing with "business as usual" I couldn't do it, either. But I can't see ghost writing as being satisfiying for someone with as strong a voice as yours. Being an evangelist for the likes of Apple or Adobe might be cool, but would that let you continue with the stream of consciousness riffs that have obviously been satifsying for you and been so energizing for us, your readers? Don't know.,
[ 2011/12/16 18:12 ] [ 編集 ]
Just look at the difference just 20-30 rock solid Tea Party conservatives have made in the House already. They've turned "1/3 of the government" on its head and started a war between the establishment party and the Tea Party.,
[ 2011/12/16 18:34 ] [ 編集 ]
Maybe the private blog is the way to go, though I suspect you'd need some time to get revved up for that. The pod/video angle sounds great, but that raises a lot of other questions. And it loses the immediacy that you enjoyed so long, which is one of the most unfortunate losses in all this.,
[ 2011/12/16 19:18 ] [ 編集 ]
I do think that by working in a team, it will make it easier for you. The passion moves away from you and to the team of writers, the hate will move with it. Being a part of a groupblog would be a good solution.,
[ 2011/12/16 19:40 ] [ 編集 ]
I also really enjoy the idea of a group blog mostly because I've always been a fan of group blogs a la 37signals. It's a different take on things that I tend to enjoy, getting to see different opinions, group dynamics, etc.,
[ 2011/12/16 20:01 ] [ 編集 ]
It's entirely possible that I copied that individual number across incorrectly (and that the index was correct), but when I did the query just then it returned a Technorati Rank of 37, so as you say there would be no change in the rank, but an improvement in your index.,
[ 2011/12/16 20:45 ] [ 編集 ]
Use your passion and geek expertise to liberate the latent creativity that resides in readers, something that works better than the linear, sequential and fast fading stream of comments (yeah, this is recursive). Comments are writing, but lets have something not as we know it. Writing in this box just feel a little klunky, there must be a better way, make a better blog :),
[ 2011/12/16 21:06 ] [ 編集 ]
Good for Hannity, hammering Mc Cain. Mc Cain off as so slimey. He completely bought into the Obama narrative and talks about the great calamity to come if there is no agreement, and continues to blast the Tea Party.,
[ 2011/12/16 21:28 ] [ 編集 ]
Is there a way use some sort of third party forum moderation to cut through this problem? Then you could go on in whatever way you are comfortable, your forums could coninue to buzz and anyone that's up to no good would hit a brick wall (or get a call from their local authorities, as appropriate). It's just a thought.,
[ 2011/12/16 21:50 ] [ 編集 ]
I understand. That is why I made the point about the state caucus to come up with acceptable Presidential candidates. My fear is we have too many conservatives that may split our vote and let a Romney, Christie get in.,
[ 2011/12/16 22:13 ] [ 編集 ]
I see two basic options for you: Reduce visibility and do something completely different, or stay visible and continue publishing your own stuff under your own name. All the options you cite can be assigned to one of these two categories. I dearly hope you go with the second option, even though I would totally understand if you decide otherwise.,
[ 2011/12/16 22:35 ] [ 編集 ]
In doing this blog and thinking about this stuff, have you ever had any ideas for what kinds of tools (software, that is) that people could use to do things like share creative ideas in groups, create customer community, etc. etc.?,
[ 2011/12/16 22:57 ] [ 編集 ]
I think greater interaction among groups would result (mix up the tech bloggers and the marketers and the VCs and the usability people and, hell, even the sex bloggers) ;) and really spark some awesome conversations.,
[ 2011/12/16 23:19 ] [ 編集 ]
One condition would be that the groupblog would adopt your style. Similar to how the headfirst books have the same style but different writers. If you join the 37signals blog where you put up highly visual articles, in a see of more textual posts, you will still stand out.,
[ 2011/12/16 23:41 ] [ 編集 ]
Is there a way use some sort of third party forum moderation to cut through this problem? Then you could go on in whatever way you are comfortable, your forums could coninue to buzz and anyone that's up to no good would hit a brick wall (or get a call from their local authorities, as appropriate). It's just a thought.,
[ 2011/12/17 00:04 ] [ 編集 ]
It would also make it a lot harder for bullying to take place, since anyone stupid enough to try it would be taking on a potentially even bigger community, as well as whoever happened to be hosting you. (Anyone who did host would have your back 100% and be able to manage comment moderation and such so you'd never even have to see the garbage.),
[ 2011/12/17 00:25 ] [ 編集 ]
Oodles of bloggers great and small would give a #1 Technorati rank (or insert personal thing of inestimable value here) to be able to host Kathy Sierra as a guest blogger. (Myself included.),
[ 2011/12/17 01:09 ] [ 編集 ]
Maybe the private blog is the way to go, though I suspect you'd need some time to get revved up for that. The pod/video angle sounds great, but that raises a lot of other questions. And it loses the immediacy that you enjoyed so long, which is one of the most unfortunate losses in all this.,
[ 2011/12/17 01:31 ] [ 編集 ]
I was thinking the same thing about Alexa as there was quite a lot of movement. They might have readjusted their adjustment for "technology skew" - or what ever it was...,
[ 2011/12/17 01:54 ] [ 編集 ]
That aside, I think that a multiple-contributor blog would give you support and provide some other perspectives. You could combine this with your ideas on coaching/ghostwriting and work with 'intern' contributors to hone their skills, see their work supplying your site, and give them the tools they need to take your philosophies and understanding out on their own tangents. It might give you a regular supply of fresh, new writers and keep things going while allowing you to step back a little. (If you did go with the intern idea, drop me a line, will you? *g*),
[ 2011/12/17 02:17 ] [ 編集 ]
One condition would be that the groupblog would adopt your style. Similar to how the headfirst books have the same style but different writers. If you join the 37signals blog where you put up highly visual articles, in a see of more textual posts, you will still stand out., http://wnudeonakedgsex.insanejournal.com rosie huntington-whiteley nude, jzobrd, http://tnudebnakedxsex.insanejournal.com angelina jolie nude, 0423, http://onudewnakedbsex.insanejournal.com jamie foxx nude, 860, http://knudegnakedusex.insanejournal.com daisy lowe nude, xjvms, http://lucypindernaked2.typepad.com lucy pinder naked, :-D,
[ 2011/12/23 20:11 ] [ 編集 ]
The reality is that the establishment in the Senate HATE CCB, modest as it really is and see the new Boehner plan as an out, since they figure they will get Reid to make a compromise since it is only 22 Billion in cuts.,
[ 2011/12/28 02:58 ] [ 編集 ]
I was thinking the same thing about Alexa as there was quite a lot of movement. They might have readjusted their adjustment for "technology skew" - or what ever it was...,
[ 2011/12/28 03:22 ] [ 編集 ]
I see two basic options for you: Reduce visibility and do something completely different, or stay visible and continue publishing your own stuff under your own name. All the options you cite can be assigned to one of these two categories. I dearly hope you go with the second option, even though I would totally understand if you decide otherwise.,
[ 2011/12/28 03:44 ] [ 編集 ]
One condition would be that the groupblog would adopt your style. Similar to how the headfirst books have the same style but different writers. If you join the 37signals blog where you put up highly visual articles, in a see of more textual posts, you will still stand out.,
[ 2011/12/28 04:07 ] [ 編集 ]
I think greater interaction among groups would result (mix up the tech bloggers and the marketers and the VCs and the usability people and, hell, even the sex bloggers) ;) and really spark some awesome conversations.,
[ 2011/12/28 04:30 ] [ 編集 ]
I hate to see us lose your input but I wonder if simply publishing articles with no comments enabled and having a members-only forum wouldn't be a good compromise. There's something about the immediacy of the response form and the lack of accountability available from anonymity (oh, hypocritical me) that seems to encourage people's awfulness.,
[ 2011/12/28 04:53 ] [ 編集 ]
I'm not sure what you have against "The Five". I mean, four of the five panel members are on the right. The only creep is Bob Beckel. I admit, his creepiness makes the show a bit harder to handle. But Greg Gutfeld makes up for it! I LOVE him!! Beckel will probably have a stroke or a heart attack on the show one day and they can just shove him off the stage and continue on.,
[ 2011/12/28 05:38 ] [ 編集 ]
I do think that by working in a team, it will make it easier for you. The passion moves away from you and to the team of writers, the hate will move with it. Being a part of a groupblog would be a good solution.,
[ 2011/12/28 06:01 ] [ 編集 ]
Oodles of bloggers great and small would give a #1 Technorati rank (or insert personal thing of inestimable value here) to be able to host Kathy Sierra as a guest blogger. (Myself included.),
[ 2011/12/28 06:23 ] [ 編集 ]
Kathy, the content you have graciously shared with us every once in a while is both inspiring and entertaining. And a blog is the perfect medium for this. A lot of the content is about your style and creative personality. Thus, I would rule out the community-based ideas. I would probably only read your stuff anyway., http://brookeshieldsnakedfb.tumblr.com brooke shields naked, 8003, http://kirstendunstnudehl.tumblr.com kirsten dunst nude, nkasd, http://kajolhotphotosum.tumblr.com kajol hot photos, %)), http://islafishernudedg.tumblr.com isla fisher nude, 15914, http://reesewitherspoonsexscenezi.tumblr.com reese witherspoon sex scene, :)),
[ 2011/12/28 07:00 ] [ 編集 ]
I see two basic options for you: Reduce visibility and do something completely different, or stay visible and continue publishing your own stuff under your own name. All the options you cite can be assigned to one of these two categories. I dearly hope you go with the second option, even though I would totally understand if you decide otherwise.,
[ 2011/12/28 07:31 ] [ 編集 ]
Just look at the difference just 20-30 rock solid Tea Party conservatives have made in the House already. They've turned "1/3 of the government" on its head and started a war between the establishment party and the Tea Party.,
[ 2011/12/28 08:38 ] [ 編集 ]
The reality is that the establishment in the Senate HATE CCB, modest as it really is and see the new Boehner plan as an out, since they figure they will get Reid to make a compromise since it is only 22 Billion in cuts.,
[ 2011/12/28 09:01 ] [ 編集 ]
That's fine for the House and Senate but for president, there is no way any conservative should vote for either Democrat that will be stuffed down our throats next year. The House is the grand prize. If we had someone like Jim Jordan as Speaker and more than the current 3 reliable conservative senators, the president wouldn't matter.,
[ 2011/12/28 09:24 ] [ 編集 ]
That's fine for the House and Senate but for president, there is no way any conservative should vote for either Democrat that will be stuffed down our throats next year. The House is the grand prize. If we had someone like Jim Jordan as Speaker and more than the current 3 reliable conservative senators, the president wouldn't matter.,
[ 2011/12/28 09:47 ] [ 編集 ]
Has he joined Obama in Wonderland where up is down and left is right? What's "fiscally conservative" about voting for every spending measure in sight?,
[ 2011/12/28 10:09 ] [ 編集 ]
I understand. That is why I made the point about the state caucus to come up with acceptable Presidential candidates. My fear is we have too many conservatives that may split our vote and let a Romney, Christie get in.,
[ 2011/12/28 10:54 ] [ 編集 ]
Maybe the private blog is the way to go, though I suspect you'd need some time to get revved up for that. The pod/video angle sounds great, but that raises a lot of other questions. And it loses the immediacy that you enjoyed so long, which is one of the most unfortunate losses in all this.,
[ 2011/12/28 11:39 ] [ 編集 ]
What is really infuriating is his denial that he was attacking the Tea Party. He was "only reading a WSJ article" on the floor of the Senate. Hannity could have done a better job of hammering on THAT giant piece of brazen hypocrisy.,
[ 2011/12/28 12:02 ] [ 編集 ]
It'd be kinda like the group blog idea, but with more of a "Where in the World is Carmen Sandiego?" vibe. And who didn't love playing that? :),
[ 2011/12/28 12:50 ] [ 編集 ]
Is there a way use some sort of third party forum moderation to cut through this problem? Then you could go on in whatever way you are comfortable, your forums could coninue to buzz and anyone that's up to no good would hit a brick wall (or get a call from their local authorities, as appropriate). It's just a thought.,
[ 2011/12/28 13:14 ] [ 編集 ]
I hate to see us lose your input but I wonder if simply publishing articles with no comments enabled and having a members-only forum wouldn't be a good compromise. There's something about the immediacy of the response form and the lack of accountability available from anonymity (oh, hypocritical me) that seems to encourage people's awfulness.,
[ 2011/12/28 13:38 ] [ 編集 ]
I always wondered if the Manchurian Candidate McLame would make an appearance. I think he is a victim of Stockholm Syndrome, too.,
[ 2011/12/28 14:03 ] [ 編集 ]
Kathy, the content you have graciously shared with us every once in a while is both inspiring and entertaining. And a blog is the perfect medium for this. A lot of the content is about your style and creative personality. Thus, I would rule out the community-based ideas. I would probably only read your stuff anyway.,
[ 2011/12/28 14:51 ] [ 編集 ]
Honestly said, I don't think you can do anything to fend off the attacks. I don't think you got attacked because of something you did, but because lots of people admire you and your work. That's apparently enough for some people to hate you. Only by unpassionating your readers, can you hope to actually stop the haters. I hope you will reject that option.,
[ 2011/12/28 15:39 ] [ 編集 ]
Maybe the private blog is the way to go, though I suspect you'd need some time to get revved up for that. The pod/video angle sounds great, but that raises a lot of other questions. And it loses the immediacy that you enjoyed so long, which is one of the most unfortunate losses in all this.,
[ 2011/12/28 16:03 ] [ 編集 ]
I hate to see us lose your input but I wonder if simply publishing articles with no comments enabled and having a members-only forum wouldn't be a good compromise. There's something about the immediacy of the response form and the lack of accountability available from anonymity (oh, hypocritical me) that seems to encourage people's awfulness.,
[ 2011/12/28 16:28 ] [ 編集 ]
O.K. I give up. What is your beef with Gutfeld? I think he is hilarious! He is not a serious contributor, but is there for laughs. I like him.,
[ 2011/12/28 16:52 ] [ 編集 ]
I was thinking the same thing about Alexa as there was quite a lot of movement. They might have readjusted their adjustment for "technology skew" - or what ever it was...,
[ 2011/12/28 17:16 ] [ 編集 ]
It'd be kinda like the group blog idea, but with more of a "Where in the World is Carmen Sandiego?" vibe. And who didn't love playing that? :),
[ 2011/12/28 17:39 ] [ 編集 ]
Use your passion and geek expertise to liberate the latent creativity that resides in readers, something that works better than the linear, sequential and fast fading stream of comments (yeah, this is recursive). Comments are writing, but lets have something not as we know it. Writing in this box just feel a little klunky, there must be a better way, make a better blog :),
[ 2011/12/28 19:32 ] [ 編集 ]
That's fine for the House and Senate but for president, there is no way any conservative should vote for either Democrat that will be stuffed down our throats next year. The House is the grand prize. If we had someone like Jim Jordan as Speaker and more than the current 3 reliable conservative senators, the president wouldn't matter.,
[ 2011/12/28 20:17 ] [ 編集 ]
I like the idea of a private blog if getting the RSS and reading posts was as simple as public. If there are too many hoops just to get notice of and read a single post it will get frustrating.,
[ 2011/12/28 20:40 ] [ 編集 ]
I understand. That is why I made the point about the state caucus to come up with acceptable Presidential candidates. My fear is we have too many conservatives that may split our vote and let a Romney, Christie get in.,
[ 2011/12/28 21:03 ] [ 編集 ]
I do think that by working in a team, it will make it easier for you. The passion moves away from you and to the team of writers, the hate will move with it. Being a part of a groupblog would be a good solution.,
[ 2011/12/28 21:25 ] [ 編集 ]
Oodles of bloggers great and small would give a #1 Technorati rank (or insert personal thing of inestimable value here) to be able to host Kathy Sierra as a guest blogger. (Myself included.),
[ 2011/12/28 21:48 ] [ 編集 ]
Maybe the private blog is the way to go, though I suspect you'd need some time to get revved up for that. The pod/video angle sounds great, but that raises a lot of other questions. And it loses the immediacy that you enjoyed so long, which is one of the most unfortunate losses in all this.,
[ 2011/12/28 22:11 ] [ 編集 ]
It would also make it a lot harder for bullying to take place, since anyone stupid enough to try it would be taking on a potentially even bigger community, as well as whoever happened to be hosting you. (Anyone who did host would have your back 100% and be able to manage comment moderation and such so you'd never even have to see the garbage.),
[ 2011/12/28 22:33 ] [ 編集 ]
I always wondered if the Manchurian Candidate McLame would make an appearance. I think he is a victim of Stockholm Syndrome, too.,
[ 2011/12/28 22:55 ] [ 編集 ]
It'd be kinda like the group blog idea, but with more of a "Where in the World is Carmen Sandiego?" vibe. And who didn't love playing that? :),
[ 2011/12/28 23:18 ] [ 編集 ]
In doing this blog and thinking about this stuff, have you ever had any ideas for what kinds of tools (software, that is) that people could use to do things like share creative ideas in groups, create customer community, etc. etc.?,
[ 2011/12/28 23:41 ] [ 編集 ]
ould also do your (wonderful) thing around the blogosphere for a while (just not always here). Keep the juices flowing, continue to help people, foster even greater community growth, and not be an (ugh) static single target.,
[ 2011/12/29 00:04 ] [ 編集 ]
Good for Hannity, hammering Mc Cain. Mc Cain off as so slimey. He completely bought into the Obama narrative and talks about the great calamity to come if there is no agreement, and continues to blast the Tea Party.,
[ 2011/12/29 00:27 ] [ 編集 ]
I'm not sure what you have against "The Five". I mean, four of the five panel members are on the right. The only creep is Bob Beckel. I admit, his creepiness makes the show a bit harder to handle. But Greg Gutfeld makes up for it! I LOVE him!! Beckel will probably have a stroke or a heart attack on the show one day and they can just shove him off the stage and continue on.,
[ 2011/12/29 00:50 ] [ 編集 ]
Take me for example. I could support Bachman, Cain, Palin, or Santorum. in no particular order. Others would choose fewer plus Paul.,
[ 2011/12/29 01:12 ] [ 編集 ]
It's entirely possible that I copied that individual number across incorrectly (and that the index was correct), but when I did the query just then it returned a Technorati Rank of 37, so as you say there would be no change in the rank, but an improvement in your index.,
[ 2011/12/29 01:35 ] [ 編集 ]
I hate to see us lose your input but I wonder if simply publishing articles with no comments enabled and having a members-only forum wouldn't be a good compromise. There's something about the immediacy of the response form and the lack of accountability available from anonymity (oh, hypocritical me) that seems to encourage people's awfulness.,
[ 2011/12/29 01:57 ] [ 編集 ]
ould also do your (wonderful) thing around the blogosphere for a while (just not always here). Keep the juices flowing, continue to help people, foster even greater community growth, and not be an (ugh) static single target., http://carlaguginonudeaq.freeforums.org carla gugino nude, 933747, http://iongocado.livejournal.com PENELOPE CRUZ SEX, %OOO, http://jaydenicolenudeox.freeforums.org jayde nicole nude, pdw, http://meganfoxnudelj.freeforums.org megan fox nude, 949045, http://cupoimovy.livejournal.com EMMA ROBERTS NUDE, :P,
[ 2012/01/02 18:19 ] [ 編集 ]
Just look at the difference just 20-30 rock solid Tea Party conservatives have made in the House already. They've turned "1/3 of the government" on its head and started a war between the establishment party and the Tea Party., http://jessicabielnudetk.freeforums.org jessica biel nude, 278724, http://rhetayna.livejournal.com TILA TEQUILA PLAYBOY, 092, http://elishacuthberthotri.freeforums.org elisha cuthbert hot, :PPP, http://tinafeynudemh.freeforums.org tina fey nude, >:-PP, http://karleenneno.livejournal.com DANIELLE FISHEL NUDE, =[[[,
[ 2012/01/04 11:43 ] [ 編集 ]
What is really infuriating is his denial that he was attacking the Tea Party. He was "only reading a WSJ article" on the floor of the Senate. Hannity could have done a better job of hammering on THAT giant piece of brazen hypocrisy., http://malinakermannudevj.freeforums.org malin akerman nude, =-DD, http://avrillavignenakedok.tumblr.com avril lavigne naked, 5048, http://parishiltonboobsfh.tumblr.com paris hilton boobs, 63048, http://idalinaegy.livejournal.com JESSE JANE NUDE, 3933, http://stasnylara.livejournal.com DEEPIKA PADUKONE HOT, shjbub,
[ 2012/01/04 11:43 ] [ 編集 ]
ould also do your (wonderful) thing around the blogosphere for a while (just not always here). Keep the juices flowing, continue to help people, foster even greater community growth, and not be an (ugh) static single target., http://emmawatsonhotkd.freeforums.org emma watson hot, kspa, http://meganfoxboobsrv.freeforums.org megan fox boobs, 792863, http://zoesaldananakedgw.tumblr.com zoe saldana naked, gkc, http://ogdanbyj.livejournal.com SHARON STONE SEX, pdqe, http://maleenykol.livejournal.com MEGAN FOX SEX TAPE, :P,
[ 2012/01/11 07:07 ] [ 編集 ]
I hate to see us lose your input but I wonder if simply publishing articles with no comments enabled and having a members-only forum wouldn't be a good compromise. There's something about the immediacy of the response form and the lack of accountability available from anonymity (oh, hypocritical me) that seems to encourage people's awfulness.,
[ 2012/01/14 00:16 ] [ 編集 ]
I also really enjoy the idea of a group blog mostly because I've always been a fan of group blogs a la 37signals. It's a different take on things that I tend to enjoy, getting to see different opinions, group dynamics, etc.,
[ 2012/01/14 00:51 ] [ 編集 ]
It's entirely possible that I copied that individual number across incorrectly (and that the index was correct), but when I did the query just then it returned a Technorati Rank of 37, so as you say there would be no change in the rank, but an improvement in your index.,
[ 2012/01/14 01:52 ] [ 編集 ]
And a belated Happy Easter to you too! The fruit cakes being compared to bricks definitely makes my chuckle list...perhaps some fruity garnish around the display would have added more relevance. It is quite strange how the human mind works, and association is key to avoid possible misyunderstandings like this one! Classic!,
[ 2012/01/14 02:22 ] [ 編集 ]
I was thinking the same thing about Alexa as there was quite a lot of movement. They might have readjusted their adjustment for "technology skew" - or what ever it was...,
[ 2012/01/14 02:51 ] [ 編集 ]
Oodles of bloggers great and small would give a #1 Technorati rank (or insert personal thing of inestimable value here) to be able to host Kathy Sierra as a guest blogger. (Myself included.),
[ 2012/01/14 04:20 ] [ 編集 ]
In doing this blog and thinking about this stuff, have you ever had any ideas for what kinds of tools (software, that is) that people could use to do things like share creative ideas in groups, create customer community, etc. etc.?,
[ 2012/01/14 04:48 ] [ 編集 ]
I also really enjoy the idea of a group blog mostly because I've always been a fan of group blogs a la 37signals. It's a different take on things that I tend to enjoy, getting to see different opinions, group dynamics, etc.,
[ 2012/01/14 05:20 ] [ 編集 ]
It would also make it a lot harder for bullying to take place, since anyone stupid enough to try it would be taking on a potentially even bigger community, as well as whoever happened to be hosting you. (Anyone who did host would have your back 100% and be able to manage comment moderation and such so you'd never even have to see the garbage.),
[ 2012/01/14 05:47 ] [ 編集 ]
One condition would be that the groupblog would adopt your style. Similar to how the headfirst books have the same style but different writers. If you join the 37signals blog where you put up highly visual articles, in a see of more textual posts, you will still stand out.,
[ 2012/01/14 06:45 ] [ 編集 ]
The reality is that the establishment in the Senate HATE CCB, modest as it really is and see the new Boehner plan as an out, since they figure they will get Reid to make a compromise since it is only 22 Billion in cuts.,
[ 2012/01/14 07:41 ] [ 編集 ]
Has he joined Obama in Wonderland where up is down and left is right? What's "fiscally conservative" about voting for every spending measure in sight?,
[ 2012/01/14 09:10 ] [ 編集 ]
I always wondered if the Manchurian Candidate McLame would make an appearance. I think he is a victim of Stockholm Syndrome, too.,
[ 2012/01/14 10:38 ] [ 編集 ]
I think that you'd probably do well in a consulting role where you are helping companies who want to improve in the area of creating passionate users (products and websites). Your knowledge of the field is shown well by your blogging, and maybe getting out in front of people will give you more of a reason to stay passionate about this subject area (if not the blog itself).,
[ 2012/01/14 11:07 ] [ 編集 ]
It's entirely possible that I copied that individual number across incorrectly (and that the index was correct), but when I did the query just then it returned a Technorati Rank of 37, so as you say there would be no change in the rank, but an improvement in your index.,
[ 2012/01/14 11:35 ] [ 編集 ]
I think that you'd probably do well in a consulting role where you are helping companies who want to improve in the area of creating passionate users (products and websites). Your knowledge of the field is shown well by your blogging, and maybe getting out in front of people will give you more of a reason to stay passionate about this subject area (if not the blog itself).,
[ 2012/01/14 12:07 ] [ 編集 ]
Honestly said, I don't think you can do anything to fend off the attacks. I don't think you got attacked because of something you did, but because lots of people admire you and your work. That's apparently enough for some people to hate you. Only by unpassionating your readers, can you hope to actually stop the haters. I hope you will reject that option.,
[ 2012/01/14 12:37 ] [ 編集 ]
I like the idea of a private blog if getting the RSS and reading posts was as simple as public. If there are too many hoops just to get notice of and read a single post it will get frustrating.,
[ 2012/01/14 13:36 ] [ 編集 ]
Kathy, the content you have graciously shared with us every once in a while is both inspiring and entertaining. And a blog is the perfect medium for this. A lot of the content is about your style and creative personality. Thus, I would rule out the community-based ideas. I would probably only read your stuff anyway.,
[ 2012/01/14 15:04 ] [ 編集 ]
Oodles of bloggers great and small would give a #1 Technorati rank (or insert personal thing of inestimable value here) to be able to host Kathy Sierra as a guest blogger. (Myself included.), http://leeleesobieskinudeqo.tumblr.com leelee sobieski nude, wmn, http://zacefronsextapeso.tumblr.com zac efron sex tape, sjevpe, http://ashleytisdalehotmo.tumblr.com ashley tisdale hot, bod, http://jenniferanistonpornno.tumblr.com jennifer aniston porn, :-(, http://lindsaylohannudaqa.tumblr.com lindsay lohan nuda, 8[[[,
[ 2012/01/18 09:34 ] [ 編集 ]
ould also do your (wonderful) thing around the blogosphere for a while (just not always here). Keep the juices flowing, continue to help people, foster even greater community growth, and not be an (ugh) static single target., http://mariaozawasex3.typepad.com maria ozawa sex, >:-], http://selenagomezboobs2.typepad.com selena gomez boobs, 660561, http://emmastonenude4.typepad.com emma stone nude, evrrlg, http://alyssamilanonaked4.typepad.com alyssa milano naked, kae, http://emmawatsonsex3.typepad.com emma watson sex, fepqqz,
[ 2012/01/26 05:39 ] [ 編集 ]
Maybe the private blog is the way to go, though I suspect you'd need some time to get revved up for that. The pod/video angle sounds great, but that raises a lot of other questions. And it loses the immediacy that you enjoyed so long, which is one of the most unfortunate losses in all this., http://tilatequilanude4.typepad.com tila tequila nude, 8-[[[, http://michellewilliamsnude2.typepad.com michelle williams nude, >:-(, http://haydenpanettierenude2.typepad.com hayden panettiere nude, uliiph, http://mariaozawasexvideo2.typepad.com maria ozawa sex video, 681956, http://tarareidnude3.typepad.com tara reid nude, qxk,
[ 2012/01/26 11:12 ] [ 編集 ]
I like the idea of a private blog if getting the RSS and reading posts was as simple as public. If there are too many hoops just to get notice of and read a single post it will get frustrating., http://emmastonenaked3.typepad.com emma stone naked, :]], http://jessicasimpsonnaked3.typepad.com jessica simpson naked, :-((, http://vanessahudgenspussy2.typepad.com vanessa hudgens pussy, >:-[[[, http://keiraknightleynude3.typepad.com keira knightley nude, :-O, http://paulaabdulnude3.typepad.com paula abdul nude, vxfwwk,
[ 2012/01/27 04:24 ] [ 編集 ]
I'm not sure what you have against "The Five". I mean, four of the five panel members are on the right. The only creep is Bob Beckel. I admit, his creepiness makes the show a bit harder to handle. But Greg Gutfeld makes up for it! I LOVE him!! Beckel will probably have a stroke or a heart attack on the show one day and they can just shove him off the stage and continue on., http://annehathawaynaked4.typepad.com anne hathaway naked, xrrpoj, http://salmahayeknaked2.typepad.com salma hayek naked, 932, http://brendasongporn2.typepad.com brenda song porn, %-]], http://adrianalimasextape3.typepad.com adriana lima sex tape, 890, http://katrinakaifnude3.typepad.com katrina kaif nude, =(((,
[ 2012/01/29 10:56 ] [ 編集 ]
コメントの投稿













管理者にだけ表示を許可する
カレンダー
06 | 2017/07 | 08
- - - - - - 1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31 - - - - -
プロフィール

43

Author:43
43のBlogへようこそ!

見たログ
Skype!

My status

QRコード
QRコード

上記広告は1ヶ月以上更新のないブログに表示されています。新しい記事を書くことで広告を消せます。